Fw: [Community] summary of today's (10/11) phone call
Bill Washburn
billhwashburn at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 16 15:08:07 PDT 2006
Eugene--
My apologies. I had intended to reply to the group initially. Sorry about that.
Please see below...
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Eugene Eric Kim <eekim at blueoxen.com>
To: Bill Washburn <billhwashburn at yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:24:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Community] summary of today's (10/11) phone call
Hi Bill,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:20:43AM -0700, Bill Washburn wrote:
>> It is my recollection that we not only agreed a quarterly meeting (telephone conference) of the Steward's Council would be a good thing, I believe we agreed and >>stipulated that a quarterly meeting of the council was a requirement we placed upon ourselves, albeit with the proviso that we could meet more often when needed.
>Would you mind mailing this to the list, so that it's on the record?
>
>FWIW, it's not clear to me what being a "requirement" would entail.
>Would this mean that we would need a punitive measure for Stewards who
>do not attend?
About the terminology of 'requirement, 'rules,' and the like. It is my
impression that there is a fundamental spirit of both seriousness and
simultaneously non-formal or non-legalistic in the comments everyone
tends to make. Therefore I would suggest that the notion of a seriou
and yet not legally rigid way of thinking about the concept of a
requirement would be something like this:
A requirement that we place upon ourselves is something we agree as a
council (and individually as council members) is important and that we
take on as a group obligation. In that case of a "requirement" that we
meet once every three months, at a minimum, I think that it could take the form of an agreement that remember and keep track of through your keeping track of the date of the most recent meeting. The idea could be as simple as we project a date 90 days out as the default date for the next meeting, unless there is a call for a meeting at an earlier date. Does that make sense?
Best regards,
=bill.washburn
>=Eugene
--
======================================================================
Eugene Eric Kim ................................ http://xri.net/=eekim
Blue Oxen Associates ........................ http://www.blueoxen.com/
======================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.idcommons.net/pipermail/community/attachments/20061016/0f8d2117/attachment.html
More information about the Community
mailing list