[Community] OpenID on http://iiw.idcommons.net/

[Bavo De Ridder]

Can we then also support the following to authenticate:

   - SAML
   - WS-Trust
   - X.509 Certificates
   - Infocards
   - ...

They are also "open" and some even have working groups within Identity
Commons. You can't be selective on the dog food you offer, all our dog food
has to be on the menu!

Now it seems like we are not "Identity Commons" but "Identity OpenID". I
would vote to reinstate username/password, at least for the foreseeable
future.

On Dec 4, 2007 1:14 AM, Joaquin Miller <jm-public at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>  ... I'd like to understand how disabling local  usernames and passwords
> is
> in opposition of our philosophy of openness?
>
>
> The message is:
>
> Please come and play with us.
>
> The way we play on this block is:
> everyone uses iNames or OpenIDs.
>
> Here are the hoops to jump through to get and use one.
>
> If, for right now, or for a little while,
> you want to stick with name and password ...
>
>          go play somewhere else.
>
>
>
> We turned that off.
> We are not open to folks who want to use name and password.
> Literally not open: we don't let such people contribute to our wiki.
> Eat our dog food or go away.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community at idcommons.net
> http://mail.idcommons.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community
>
>


-- 
=bavo.de.ridder (http://xri.net/=bavo.de.ridder)
Visit me at http://xri.net/=bavo.de.ridder/(+home)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.idcommons.net/pipermail/community/attachments/20071204/fd3e91b2/attachment.htm