[Community] Workgroup for "Enterprise Identity"

[Drummond Reed]

Bavo,

 

I reviewed the charter and it looks pretty good but one thing caught my eye:
in the Licenses section it says:

 

"Conversation withing the working group, including the list, is private to
the working group."

 

While it is fine for the WG to adopt such a restriction, is it really
needed? To my knowledge the only other Identity Commons WGs operating a
private list is the Identity Gang list, and folks there sometimes wonder if
it needed to be private.

 

However, if you believe there are good reasons (such as the need to discuss
specific enterprise use cases that participants would not want public),
that's fine, I just wanted to inquire about the rationale.

 

Thanks,

 

=Drummond  

 

  _____  

From: community-bounces at idcommons.net
[mailto:community-bounces at idcommons.net] On Behalf Of Bavo De Ridder
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 5:47 AM
To: community at idcommons.net
Subject: Re: [Community] Workgroup for "Enterprise Identity"

 

Hi,

I have created a first draft of a charter on
http://wiki.idcommons.net/moin.cgi/EnterpriseIdentityCharter

Feel free to comment or discuss. Anyone with a better knowledge of English
is welcome to improve the text. 

On 1/17/07, Bavo De Ridder <bderidder at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Browsing through the site of Identity Commons I couldn't find a working
group that is specializing in what you could call "Enterprise Identity".
Meaning managing identity from a company's point of view, in particular B2E,
B2B and B2C. Today there exists a certain gap between what is happening in
the enterprise identity world (where centralization and IDM suites still
reign the world) and internet identity where open and flexible models and
protocols are being developed. I sincerely believe that both worlds need to
grow towards each other eventually becoming "one". This in light of the
fading walls and borders around companies and between different user groups
(B2E, B2B ...). 

Is anyone interested in joining me to create such a group?

-- 
=bavo.de.ridder ( http://xri.net/=bavo.de.ridder
<http://xri.net/=bavo.de.ridder> )
Visit me at http://xri.net/=bavo.de.ridder/(+home)
<http://xri.net/=bavo.de.ridder/%28+home%29>  




-- 
=bavo.de.ridder (http://xri.net/=bavo.de.ridder)
Visit me at http://xri.net/=bavo.de.ridder/(+home) 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.idcommons.net/pipermail/community/attachments/20070206/3446aa9e/attachment-0001.html